Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Nation and race in the twentieth century scientific discourse on Viking Age runestones

Seminarium

Per Holmberg talar på temat Nation and race in the twentieth century scientific discourse on Viking Age runestones.

Abstract
The boom for researching runestone inscriptions in the early twentieth century coincided with a renewed romantic and often nationalist interest in the Viking Age, i.e. late Scandinavian Iron Age. This study focuses the interpretations of the most famous runestone inscription: the Rök runestone. This runestone holds a prominent position in Swedish cultural heritage due to a passage of the inscription that has been read and interpreted as a reference to Theodoric the Great, the Ostrogoth emperor who reigned in Ravenna 475¿526 AD (cf. Wessén 1958). The aim of this study is to deconstruct the Rök ¿ Ravenna connection in order to better understand how this idea has been legitimatized. Special attention is paid to one of the central participants of the debate, the Austrian Germanic philologist Otto Höfler (1901¿1987) who started his academic career as associate professor in Uppsala 1927-1933, became professor in Munich 1938-1945 as an outspoken Nazi supporter, and later held a chair in Vienna 1957¿1971. The construction of the Germanic, Gothic race, culture and religion in Höfler¿s publications on the Rök runestone, five papers and one book (1952), is analysed in detail and related to other parts of his work. Previous research (Gajek 2005, Zernack 2005) has given a good picture of the ideology of Höfler, and its ties to the Nazi regime. However, research has not focused on Höfler¿s quest for the meaning of Theodoric in the inscription of Rök. Differences and similarities between Höfler¿s position and his main opponent, the Swedish linguist and philologist Elias Wessén (1889¿1981) are investigated. The key passages of their works are analysed in regard of the functions and qualities attributed to Theodoric, and their appraisal or refutation of other Rök runestone scholars. The analysis unfolds a discursive tension between race and nation in the legitimization of a Gothic connection

References
Gajek, Ester 2005. Germanenkunde und Nationalsozialismus. Zur Verflechtung von Wissenschaft und Politik am Beispiel Otto Höflers. In: Schmitz & Vollnhals (Hrsg.), Völkische Bewegung ¿ konservative Revolution ¿ Nationalsozialismus. Aspekte einer politisierten Kultur. Dresden.
Höfler, Otto 1952. Der Runenstein von Rök und die germanische Individualweihe. Tübingen.
Zernack, Julia 2005. Kontinuität als Problem der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Otto Höfler und das Münchner Institut für Nordische Philologie und Germanische Altertumskunde. In: Böldl & Kauko (Hrsg.), Kontinuität in der Kritik. Zum 50jährigen Bestehen des Münchener Nordistikinstituts. Historische und aktuelle Perspektiven der Skandinavistik. Freiburg im Breisgau.
Wessén, Elias 1958. Runstenen vid Röks kyrka. Stockholm.

Föreläsare: Per Holmberg

Datum: 2018-03-09

Tid: 13:15 - 15:00

Kategorier: Svenska, Humaniora, Språk

Arrangör: Institutionen för svenska språket

Plats: Lennart Torstenssonsgatan 6-8
K235

Kontaktperson: Susanna Karlsson

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktionen|Sidan uppdaterades: 2018-01-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?